🔗 Share this article

The Life Cycle of a Cult can be marked by distinct phases.

1. The Big Idea

An inspiring figure or coaches propose a new and transcendent idea pledging a solution for struggling players.

And so it goes. They’re getting ready to challenge the establishment overseas. The gunships are circling. Signs of trouble appear from the out-houses. An isolated player, vulnerable, shivering, the phrase ATTACKING MINDSET smeared across his chest as a symbol, has stumbled through the lines and is removed with discretion towards an inconclusive loan stint at Derbyshire.

Do you recall the start, when optimism reigned? The days of Bazball 1.0, of pure instinct.

2. Initial Adoration

Team architects promise a fresh beginning, optimism ahead, love, salvation among a group with shared faith in the philosophy.

What was this thing at first? A team united basking in glory. Tattoos. Muscles. Focus. Elite male wellness energy. Oh sure, England’s players will claim Bazball doesn’t actually exist, which is funny as it’s denied, what was that spectacle?

But we know the concept. It’s the batsman executing a stroke so depraved it has to be pixelated. It’s the adrenaline of Ben Stokes in his final form, a demeanor suggesting: focused titan, rugged appearance, hair woven from beaver hide, genuinely raw you half-expect to glance over and see him playing at mid-off bare-chested holding a fish.

It’s the batsman still being allowed addressing the media, out there looking like a happy little woodland creature in a waistcoat, expressing thoughts like we are actively deconstructing the orange. Indeed, the atmosphere, initially, was entirely positive.

3. A New Life

Growth phase. Cohesion maintained via memorization of mantras. These ideas are often illogical as a loyalty check.

Am I alone? The backlash, the fury, the disappointment post-defeat feels overblown, overdone. The batting collapsed in Perth, as history shows. They were dominated defensively during a brief period as the bowling and captaincy fell apart, carved around by the batsman batting like England but better, adaptive to conditions, a performer excelling with aura.

Now there is the attacks, the rage, the sense of English Test cricket as a failure. The opinion suggests that defeat must be total, they need to lose righteously, to be cleansed, obliterated, overwhelmed via traditional methods of the bowler’s action, the simple basics of Scott Boland, out there celebrating achievements modestly similar to getting a nice new fishing rod. How will they respond?

4. The Backlash Phase

Issues emerge from failures in the plan. Yet, mistakes are denied. It turns to hostility externally.

The fact remains, a few days before from the second Test, we are at an intriguing moment in the story of this thing. Victory is possible in the next Test through aggressive play. More likely, defeat could come swiftly. In case of defeat it feels like we may see the decline.

Ahead of this, a couple of points to consider on the topic. Previously, at the start, of light and heat, an piece was published calling it a phenomenon. There was outrage, which proved the point since it’s clear the best way of proving something definitely isn’t a cult is if supporters react defensively rejecting criticism of the philosophy.

The developments in the last few days is just as interesting. It seems that hating Bazball has now become the cult. Social media is furious, critical analysts, shots of angry middle-aged followers overseas cheated out of three days of cricket, like a room full of timeshare owners seeking justice.

Meanwhile, exists the larger scene of the opponent’s mixed ingrained annoyance at these weirdly passive-aggressive buccaneers, stating, your cherished traditions and have developed as part of your identity from the opposition, well, it’s all a bit of a gag ultimately.

Here lies the truth. It’s all cults. The approach was a phenomenon since the sport itself is insular. In fact, the team has long been exclusive, a circle, an elite gathering, a closed world with two hundred years of ceremonial past defining it. This has always been where influence is guarded. It’s the British pastime of England, the original sports washers. And surprisingly, the country is a phenomenon, a system of unknown levels, a royal family remains.

The players have been enclosed in this environment for years. Attempting to break free, to build a better atmosphere, they are just repeating their past, creating another a bubble, a closed circle, however with a modern squad and a leader promoting authenticity provided you conform.

Live where your feet are. Embrace challenges. However much you change, things stay similar.

Reflecting on this, it might be appropriate to show understanding for the movement, to acknowledge its merits, which are significant. How to define it? Encouraging expression. Challenging orthodoxies. Batting aggressively|Attacking with